
Senior officials accuse Israel of pushing Syria toward
confrontation in the south, claiming Jerusalem is trying to seize more
territory and possibly establish Druze autonomy.
Senior figures close to Syria's new leadership have told
media outlets they fear Israel is pushing Syria toward confrontation in the
south, in what they describe as an attempt to create an opening to seize
additional territory and possibly establish Druze autonomy.
The Saudi magazine Al-Majalla quoted very senior regime officials who said the situation in southern Syria is "deteriorating rapidly" and that last week Israel and Syria stood on the brink of another clash, after Druze forces allegedly planned an attack on Syrian forces in Suwayda in coordination with Israel. (Read More)
_________________________
Senior Researcher Brad Myers Comments,
Now we have senior officials in Damascus warning, "You'll get war." Does this have anything to do with the future war between Damascus and Israel described in Isaiah 17, in which Damascus will be removed from being a city and become a fallen ruin?
"The oracle concerning Damascus. 'Behold, Damascus is about to be removed from being a city and will become a fallen ruin.'" — Isaiah 17:1 (NASB 1995)
The answer to this question is no, according to a number of very well-known Bible prophecy teachers. They dogmatically believe that this prophecy in Isaiah 17:1 was fulfilled by the Assyrian king Tiglath-Pileser III in 732 B.C. But are they correct according to what the biblical text in Isaiah 17:1 and 2 Kings 16:9–10 LITERALLY says?
Was the city of Damascus actually removed from being a city in 732 B.C.?
In his article, "Why the Destruction of Damascus is a Future War Prophecy," Dr. Bill Salus quotes from 2 Kings 16:9–10 and raises some very interesting questions:
...was the city of Damascus in 732 B.C. actually reduced to RUINS as worded by an overwhelming number of Bible translations of Isaiah 17:1? In the Bible we read in 2 Kings 16:9-10 the biblical account of when the king of Assyria, Tiglath-Pileser went against Damascus and captured it.
“... the king of Assyria went up AGAINST DAMASCUS and CAPTURED IT, and carried the people of it away into exile to Kir, and put Rezin to death. Now King Ahaz WENT TO DAMASCUS to meet TIGLATH-PILESER king of Assyria, and saw the altar which was AT DAMASCUS; and King Ahaz sent to Urijah the priest the pattern of the altar and its model, according to all its workmanship.” (2 Kings 16:9-10, NASB 1995)
As you can see the biblical account has no record of Tiglath-Pileser attacking Damascus and the city becoming a heap of ruins. If the city of Damascus was in ruins after the destruction, how was King Ahaz still able to meet TIGLATH-PILESER IN A CITY that the Assyrians literally reduced to rubble?"



















