"We Will Use What We Never Have": Israel’s Nuclear Warning to the Iranian Regime

An Israeli security official has sparked international alarm by suggesting the use of non-conventional weapons if the state faces an existential threat, just as US envoys confirm Iran is only seven

days away from having enough material for a nuclear bomb. 

The rhetoric surrounding the Iranian nuclear crisis has reached a dangerous new peak, with high-ranking officials in both the United States and Israel signaling that the time for conventional diplomacy may be running out. During a candid interview on Sunday, Steve Witkoff, the U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East, revealed a staggering intelligence assessment: the Iranian regime has accelerated its uranium enrichment far beyond civilian needs. According to Witkoff, Tehran is currently "one week away" from possessing enough highly enriched material to produce a nuclear weapon. This revelation was followed by an even more provocative statement from Nissim Vaturi, a member of the Knesset’s Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, who hinted that Israel is prepared to utilize its most secretive and powerful deterrents if the regime continues its march toward a bomb.

The assessment provided by Steve Witkoff underscores the failure of previous efforts to contain Tehran’s nuclear ambitions. "The Iranians have enriched uranium to a much higher level than a civilian level, over 60 percent," Witkoff stated, adding that they are likely just seven days from holding the material necessary for a weapon. This rapid progress has fundamentally changed the calculus for the Trump administration, which has prioritized "zero enrichment" as its primary goal. The presence of the "beautiful armada" in the region is no longer just a show of force, but a necessary shield against a regime that is on the verge of crossing the nuclear threshold.

Responding to this looming existential threat, Nissim Vaturi issued a stern warning that has been interpreted as a rare reference to Israel's rumored nuclear capabilities. "No one wants to try us, if we feel threatened to the point of an existential threat, Israel will use a weapon it has not used to this day," Vaturi declared. He further alluded to the Dimona nuclear facility by stating, "We have a textile factory," a common Israeli euphemism for its strategic deterrent. Vaturi’s comments suggest that if the Iranian regime believes it can hide behind a nuclear shield of its own, it is making a fatal miscalculation. As the Geneva talks loom, the message from Jerusalem is clear: Israel will not allow a second Holocaust, and every weapon in the arsenal, conventional or otherwise, is on the table to ensure the survival of the Jewish state. (Ed note: If Iran acquires enough enriched uranium, they will duck tape that bomb to an ICBM and send it immediately to Israel. Israel is well aware of that threat. And, listen up, Syria, this isn't just an idle threat from Israel.)  (Source)

Huckabee: Iran Still Trying to Enrich Uranium, Hasn’t ‘Scrapped’ Nuke Program, Has ‘Alarming’ Buildup of Ballistic Missiles

On Saturday’s broadcast of the Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends,” United States Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee responded to a question on if Iran is rebuilding its nuclear program by saying that they are “continuing to try to enrich uranium. They haven’t given up on it” and “they are building up, at an alarming rate, their ballistic missile capacity. That’s not a defensive posture.”

Huckabee said, “The talks continue. We hope that they could be successful. But successful means that Iran’s got to give up their nuclear aspirations, they have to stop enriching uranium. The president has been so clear…he’s told them what has to happen. It really is up to them, do they want to be a part of a civilized society or do they want to continue to do what they’ve done for 47 years, and that’s yell out, ‘Death to America’, put contracts out to assassinate President Trump, kill thousands of Americans, and work really hard to get a long-range ballistic missile with a nuclear warhead so that they could shoot it at America? That’s their choice.

Co-host Charles Hurt then asked, “So, do we have real evidence at the moment that they are, in fact, rebuilding their nuclear program?” Huckabee answered, “We know that they’re continuing to try to enrich uranium. They haven’t given up on it. Yes, so, we know that they have not scrapped their program and said, yeah, we don’t really need this after all. We also know that they are building up, at an alarming rate, their ballistic missile capacity. That’s not a defensive posture.” (Source)

Solution to Iran crisis is regime change, ousting Khamenei, Saudi royal family source tells N12

A Saudi royal family source told N12 that the solution for Iran is no longer a limited military strike but a fundamental regime change, starting with the ousting of Supreme Leader Khamenei.

The solution for Iran is no longer a limited military move, but a large, fundamental change, including the ousting of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, a Saudi royal family source told N12 News on Sunday. Khamenei and the regime "must be eliminated one by one," and "the only solution is to change the regime in Iran in one way or another," the source said.

"After the [anti-regime Iranian] protesters lost faith in [US President Donald] Trump, the solution is to eliminate the top leadership one by one, starting with Khamenei, so that there will be no leaders left, and then hold elections," they continued. Crown Prince Reza "Pahlavi is apparently not acceptable to the majority of the public inside Iran," the source said.

There is a feeling of missed opportunity on the streets of Iran, which has stemmed from not only the intense repression by the Islamic Regime, but also the lack of external support, according to the source.
"Trump missed the opportunity to eliminate the heads of the regime's security apparatus who suppressed the past protests, and by doing so, he lost the trust of the protesters," the source said. This was "the strategic mistake of the US and Israel - the lack of understanding of the social dimension inside Iran and the failure to build an alternative to the regime," the source added.  (Ed note: But didn't the Saudi Royal family just last week refuse the US the right to fly across their county to attack Iran?)   (Read More)

Saudi message may pave way for US strike on Iran

According to a diplomat from the region, Riyadh has conveyed a message that it is no longer blocking a US move against Tehran and is not ruling out the overthrow of the regime. The shift comes amid American pressure and a sense that Iran is dragging its feet in negotiations. However, Saudi Arabia is unlikely to join any military action for fear of an Iranian response.

Saudi Arabia has shifted its stance on the possibility of a US military strike against Iran and is no longer opposing such a move, according to a diplomat from the region. Riyadh is also not ruling out the overthrow of the regime in Tehran, the source said, though it is unlikely to join any military action for fear of Iranian retaliation. The message was recently conveyed to Washington after mounting American pressure and amid a growing perception that Tehran is stalling in negotiations. According to the diplomat, the Saudis made clear they would no longer block a US strike.

The position marks a departure from Riyadh's recent stance. Saudi Arabia had repeatedly stressed that it was not interested in regional escalation and had made clear it would not allow its territory to be used for an attack on the Islamic Republic of Iran. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman had also held talks with Iran's leadership and sent conciliatory messages as part of an effort to prevent deterioration.

In addition, Riyadh has coordinated with other Gulf states to reduce tensions, including through security dialogue and regional contacts. The backdrop has been concern over a potential Iranian response targeting Saudi oil facilities and critical infrastructure, a scenario that has materialized in the past. Against that backdrop, the latest message to Washington reflects a shift in tone and approach, even if it does not signal willingness to take part directly in military action. (Source)

Iran could order proxies to attack American targets in retaliation if US strikes - NYT

Attacks could reportedly include the Houthis resuming its attacks on Western shipping boats in the Red Sea, or Hezbollah, al-Qaeda, and other "affiliates" attacking US bases or embassies in Europe.

Iran may order its proxies to retaliate against American targets worldwide should US President Donald Trumporder "large-scale attacks" against the regime, the New York Times reported on Sunday evening, citing US and Western officials. Speaking on the condition of anonymity, the officials told NYT that, while they haven't learned of any specific plots, "heightened 'chatter'" in intercepted terrorist communications "indicates some level of attack planning and coordination."

“Iran can work through proxies to conduct terrorist attacks that will raise costs for any US military campaign,” Executive Director of the Soufan Center in New York, Colin P. Clarke, shared with NYT, explaining that should Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the IRGC feel threatened by the US's attack, it may lead to them "order[ing] terror attacks abroad, including in Europe."

Such attacks could reportedly include the Houthis resuming their attacks on Western shipping boats in the Red Sea, or Hezbollah, al-Qaeda, and other "affiliates" attacking US bases or embassies in Europe. According to the NYT , the Pentagon has in recent days rushed to order the preparation of additional Patriot batteries and other missile defenses to protect its troops stationed across the Middle East. (Read More)

Fresh campus protests in Iran continue for second day with shows of defiance

40-day memorial services for those killed in brutal crackdown last month become a rallying point for new demonstrations; regime stages pro-government counterprotests.

New anti-government protests continued for a second day in Iran, witnesses said Sunday, as university students in Tehran and another city demonstrated around memorials for thousands of people killed in a crackdown on previous nationwide demonstrations about six weeks ago. Iran’s state news agency said students protested at five universities in the capital, Tehran, and one in the city of Mashhad on Sunday. The scattered protests erupted Saturday at universities following 40-day memorials for people killed in January during anti-government rallies.

Iran’s government has not commented on the latest protests. However, Iranian media sought to highlight pro-regime demonstrations. Following campus rallies commemorating the protest dead on Saturday, the Fars news agency on Sunday published videos of fresh crowds of dozens of people waving Iranian flags and carrying memorial photographs at universities in the capital, Tehran.

One showed a rowdy gathering at Sharif University of Technology shouting, “Death to the shah” — a reference to the monarchy ousted by the 1979 Islamic Revolution — as they faced off with another group, with men in uniforms between them. Fars said there had been “tensions” at a minimum of three universities in Tehran, where some students chanted “anti-establishment” slogans. Iran International, a media outlet based outside the country and branded a “terrorist” organization by Tehran, shared a video on social media of students holding up the pre-revolution flag at Sharif University, as well as videos of rallies at other institutions of higher learning. (Read More)

'This isn’t a token strike,' analysts say as US prepares for a major confrontation with Iran

US military buildup in the Middle East signals a possible strike on Iran’s regime, with analysts suggesting it could lead to regime collapse within weeks.

“As I understand it, this is the biggest military buildup in the Middle East since 2003,” Col. Richard Kemp, a former British Army commander, told The Media Line. He paused on the comparison. The amount of force now in place, he said, is greater than what was visible during the12-day war in June 2025. “It’s very significant military power,” he added.

For weeks, the word “imminent” has circulated in Washington and across the region. But timelines remain unclear. It could unfold quickly. It could take longer. Kemp’s focus was less on rhetoric and more on the military posture taking shape around Iran. “I think it’s likely there will be a military strike, but I don’t think you’d say it’s inevitable,” he said. “I think it’s very likely.” The 2003 comparison is not just a line for emphasis. The footprint on the ground and at sea has grown noticeably in recent weeks.

There are now four American carrier strike groups either in the wider Middle East or moving toward it. That alone changes the equation. In the surrounding waters, roughly a dozen guided-missile destroyers are spread out, some near the Strait of Hormuz, others operating closer to the Red Sea. The United States already had a large presence in the region. More than 40,000 personnel are stationed across military bases and naval assets. With the arrival of the most recent carrier group, several thousand more service members are being added to that total. (Read More)

Witkoff Warns Iran is a Week Away from Weapons-Grade Uranium

US Envoy Steve Witkoff issues a chilling warning that Iran is now just one week away from nuclear bomb material. With the U.S. drawing a "red line" at zero enrichment and President Trump questioning why Tehran hasn't capitulated, the specter of a major military escalation looms over the Middle East. In a Fox News interview yesterday (Saturday), US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff stated that Iran is approximately one week away from possessing enough enriched uranium for a nuclear weapon, emphasizing, "This is already very dangerous. I can't allow this."

He highlighted zero uranium enrichment as a US "red line" in negotiations, noting current levels far exceed civilian needs. He added: “They say it’s all for a civilian program, but in practice they enriched far beyond the level required for civilian nuclear energy. They reached 60%, and they are probably a week away from industrial-level material for bomb production and that is already very dangerous. I cannot allow that. That’s something they will have to adhere to until they prove to us that they know how to behave.”

Witkoff also revealed President Trump is "curious" why Iran hasn't "capitulated" despite US military pressure, including naval deployments in the region. Regarding past claims of an ineffective Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear sites, Witkoff previously disputed leaked intelligence in a June 24, 2025, appearance on "The Ingraham Angle," calling the leak "treasonous" and asserting the strikes eviscerated key facilities. (Source)

Netanyahu Theatens Iran: "If the Ayatollahs attack, they will be hit with a response they cannot even imagine."

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has laid down a clear marker for both Washington and Tehran, outlining Israel's "ironclad principles" for any future diplomacy and warning the Islamic Republic of an unprecedented military response should it choose escalation. In a high-stakes statement following his recent discussions with President Donald Trump, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sent a blunt message to the "Ayatollahs" in Tehran, signaling that while the U.S. may be exploring a diplomatic path, Israel’s military readiness remains at a breaking point.

According to sources close to the Prime Minister’s Office, Netanyahu presented a "maximalist" list of demands to the Trump administration, insisting that any new agreement must go beyond the original JCPOA framework. These "principles" reportedly include: 

*  Zero Enrichment: A total halt to all uranium enrichment on Iranian soil. 

* The Missile Clause: Strict limitations, or the total dismantling, of Iran’s ballistic missile program.

* Proxy Neutralization: An end to Iranian funding and arms transfers to "Axis of Resistance" groups like Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis.

Netanyahu’s warning comes at a time of extreme regional volatility. With President Trump’s "Beautiful Armada" already positioned in the Gulf and Secretary of State Marco Rubio signaling a "Common Sense Realism" approach to the region, the Israeli security establishment is reportedly operating on high alert. The Prime Minister emphasized that Israel is not merely a bystander in the U.S.-led diplomatic efforts. By stating that Israel is "prepared for any scenario," Netanyahu reaffirmed Israel's "Freedom of Action", the doctrine that the IDF reserves the right to strike Iranian nuclear or military assets independently if the regime crosses specific red lines. (Read More)

Trump's Mar-a-Lago could be targeted if US attacks Iran, says Iranian MP - report

An Iranian member of parliament warned that Iran could expand any wartime response beyond the Middle East and said that even US President Donald Trump’s “own palace” could be targeted, according to remarks published by Iranian outlet Didban Iran and later translated by Iran International. The lawmaker was identified as Amir Hayat Moghaddam, a member of Iran’s parliament and its national security and foreign policy commission. Iran International quoted him as saying Iran would deliver a “crushing response” if attacked by the United States.

According to the report, Moghaddam said Iran could sink a US warship in the Sea of Oman, strike US bases in the region, and target American forces, including “soldier, officer, or general.” He also said Iran’s attacks might not remain limited to the Middle East and could reach the US itself, adding that “Trump’s own palace” could one day be hit, in an apparent reference to Mar-a-Lago.

Didban Iran’s homepage listing shows the interview headline carrying the same language and identifies Moghaddam as a member of the parliamentary committee. No immediate US official response to Moghaddam’s specific remarks was identified in the reports reviewed by The Jerusalem Post at the time of publication. Reuterscoverage on Friday focused on the broader US-Iran escalation, including President Trump’s warning that Iran must make a deal within 10 to 15 days and Tehran’s threats to retaliate against US bases in the region if attacked. (Source)

Iran retaliates after EU blacklists IRGC

Iran’s Foreign Ministry announced on Saturday that it has designated the navies and air forces of all European Union (EU) member states as terrorist organizations, the Xinhua news agency reported. The move was described as a response to the EU’s recent decision to label Iran’s Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) a terrorist organization, which Tehran called “unlawful and unjustified."

In a statement, the ministry said the EU decision is “in contradiction with the fundamental principles and rules of the United Nations Charter and international law." The statement added that the Iranian government acted in accordance with a 2019 law, under which “all those countries that in any way comply with or support the US decision to declare the IRGC a terrorist organization will be subject to reciprocal action." Iran’s move came three days after the Council of the EU formally added the IRGC to the bloc’s terrorist list, following a political agreement reached by EU foreign ministers last month. 

The agreement was made possible after France said it would support the move, withdrawing its longstanding opposition to it. The designation triggers restrictive measures under the EU counterterrorism sanctions regime, including the freezing of the group’s funds and other financial assets or economic resources within EU member states. Tehran was outraged by the EU’s late January announcement that it would classify the IRGC as a terrorist organization and summoned all EU ambassadors in the country. (Ed note: Why wouldn't the Shia mullahs of Iran care if there were war? In the Shiite religion of the Twelver, the 12th Imam will return during a time of great turmoil and chaos. This whole war fits right in with their religion.) (Source)

'Deal would be a miracle': US military buildup fuels uncertainty in Tehran

A sharp increase in US military deployments to the Middle East has intensified uncertainty in Tehran, where analysts and officials are debating whether the buildup signals imminent conflict or a bid to gain leverage in nuclear negotiations. Multiple US outlets reported on Thursday that national security officials have informed President Donald Trump that the military has positioned the necessary air and naval assets in the region to carry out a strike “within days,” potentially even by the end of this week.

In Tehran, some analysts cautioned that the military moves could signal genuine escalation rather than routine pressure. Political analyst Mohammad Soltaninejad told Entekhab: “If the negotiations fail or the US position changes—as happened before the 12-day war and in the middle of negotiations—it is possible that war could break out.” Jalal Sadatian, a former Iranian ambassador to the United Kingdom, said in an interview with ILNA that war remains an unattractive option for regional states, particularly given the risk of US bases in those countries being targeted.

“The balance is still tilted somewhat more toward negotiation than toward war,” he said, arguing that Trump appears to be “more focused on threats and exercising pressure.” The military buildup follows the second round of nuclear talks between Iran and the United States, which ended Tuesday in Geneva without tangible results. Cautious optimism expressed by Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has not translated into broad confidence in Tehran. Financial markets have reacted nervously. Iran’s currency weakened nearly one percent in a single day, with the dollar rising toward 1,630,000 rials, reflecting broader concerns about the risk of escalation. (Read More)

Islamic State begins new phase of operations against Syrian regime with two terror attacks

Islamic State claimed responsibility on Saturday for two attacks targeting Syrian army personnel in northern and eastern Syria, as the terrorist group signaled what it described as a new phase of operations against the country’s leadership. The terrorist group said on its Dabiq news agency that it had targeted “an individual of the apostate Syrian regime” in the city of Mayadin in Deir al-Zor province using a pistol, and attacked two other personnel with machine guns in the northern city of Raqqa.  

Syria’s Defence Ministry said in a statement that a Syrian army soldier and a civilian were killed on Saturday by “unknown assailants.” A military source told Reuters the soldier belonged to the army’s 42nd Division. The attacks come amid a sharp escalation by IS against Syria’s leadership under President Ahmed al-Sharaa, a former al Qaeda leader who broke with the group in 2016 before leading a coalition of Islamist factions that overthrew President Bashar al-Assad at the end of 2024.

On Saturday evening, IS released a recorded statement by its spokesperson, Abu Hudhayfa al-Ansari, who said Syria had “moved from Iranian occupation to Turkish-American occupation.” The group said it had begun a “new phase of operations” in Syria, describing Sharaa as a “watchdog” of the global coalition and vowing that his fate would be no different from that of Assad. Sharaa signed Syria’s accession to the global coalition to defeat IS during a visit to the US last November, when he met President Donald Trump. (Ed note: Always keep one eye on the state of Syria.)   (Read More)

Report: Hezbollah preparing for war with Israel

Hezbollah is preparing for a possible war with Israel, Al-Arabiya reported. The report follows assessments that Iran is pressuring the terror group to join the fighting if the US strikes Iran. Sources who spoke with the Al-Arabiya claimed that the Friday airstrikes carried out in Lebanon’s Beqaa Valley were a “prelude" to an Israeli military operation - one that appears likely to be conducted in parallel with strikes on Iran.

The report quoted sources close to Hezbollah who told Al-Arabiya and Al-Hadath, both Saudi news outlets, that Hezbollah is no longer run by Lebanese leaders, but rather by officers of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, some of whom were already present in Lebanon.

According to the sources, the Iranian IRGC officers are not only responsible for rebuilding Hezbollah’s capabilities, but are also personally overseeing operational plans and meeting with Hezbollah teams in various areas in order to issue instructions. The report added that these Iranian officers also met with members of the missile unit that was targeted Friday in the Beqaa region. (Source)

What Is a Balance-of-Payments Deficit?

President Trump’s new tariffs were imposed under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which allows temporary import restrictions when the United States faces “fundamental international payments problems,” including a “large and serious” balance-of-payments deficit. The term is not commonly used outside economic policy circles, but it refers broadly to a country’s financial relationship with the rest of the world. The balance of payments is a comprehensive record of all economic transactions between a nation and foreign countries. It includes trade in goods and services, income from overseas investments, cross-border financial flows such as purchases of stocks and bonds, and changes in official reserves.

In strict accounting terms, the balance of payments always balances: money leaving the country must be offset by money coming in. But when policymakers refer to a “deficit,” they are usually describing a persistent shortfall in trade and income flows—known as the current account—that must be financed by borrowing or by selling domestic assets to foreign investors. Historically, under fixed exchange-rate systems such as the postwar Bretton Woods framework, sustained deficits often led governments to lose gold or foreign-exchange reserves as they intervened to support their currencies. Under today’s floating exchange rates, the adjustment typically occurs through capital inflows from abroad, currency movements, or both.

The United States has run current-account deficits for decades, financed largely by foreign purchases of U.S. assets, including Treasury securities, corporate bonds, and equities. This doesn’t mean the deficit disappears. Rather, it is financialized. Critics argue that because the accounts balance by definition, a balance-of-payments deficit cannot exist in a floating exchange-rate system. Economists generally use the term more loosely to describe sustained external imbalances that require ongoing financing or adjustment rather than a literal mismatch in the accounting totals.

Section 122 uses the terminology common in policy debates at the time the law was enacted. Whether current U.S. conditions meet the statute’s standard is a matter of legal interpretation and presidential judgment. (Ed note: The amount of US Treasury Bonds sold to foreign countries is also directly linked to the US balance of payments. This is considered a budget deficit, and its amount is over 9.1 TRILLION DOLLARS as of June 2025.) (Read More)

US strikes on Iran could target individual leaders, officials say

United States military planning on Iran has reached an advanced stage with options including targeting individuals as part of an attack and even pursuing regime change in Tehran, if ordered by US President Donald Trump, two US officials told Reuters. The military options are the latest signs that the US is preparing for a serious conflict with Iran should diplomatic efforts fail. Reuters first reported last week that the US military is preparing for a sustained, weeks-long operation against Iran that could include striking Iranian security facilities as well as nuclear infrastructure.

The latest revelations suggest more granular, ambitious planning ahead of a decision by Trump, who has in recent days publicly floated the idea of regime change in the Islamic Republic. The US officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the planning, did not offer further details on which individuals could be targeted or how the US military could attempt to carry out regime change without a large ground force.

Pursuing regime change would mark another shift away from Trump's vows during the presidential campaign to abandon what he has called the failed policies of past administrations, which included military efforts to topple governments in Afghanistan and Iraq. Trump has assembled a massive amount of firepower in the Middle East, but most of the combat capabilities are aboard warships and fighter aircraft. Any major bombing campaign could also count on support from US-based bombers. (Read More)

Israeli officials believe US, Iran at unbridgeable impasse as they near open conflict

Iran and the United States continued to slide rapidly toward military conflict at the weekend, as hopes faded for a diplomatic solution to their standoff over Tehran’s nuclear program and regional actions, officials on both sides and diplomats across the Gulf and Europe said. Israel and Iran’s Gulf neighbors now consider a conflict to be more likely than a settlement, the sources said, with Washington building up one of its biggest military deployments in the region since the invasion of Iraq in 2003.

Israel’s government believes Tehran and Washington are at an impasse and is making preparations for possible joint military action with the United States, though no decision has been made yet on whether to carry out such an operation, said a source familiar with the planning. It would be the second time the US and Israel have attacked Iran in less than a year, following US and Israeli airstrikes against military and nuclear facilities last June.

Regional officials say oil-producing Gulf countries are preparing for a possible military confrontation that they fear could spin out of control and destabilize the Middle East. Two Israeli officials told Reuters they believe the gaps between Washington and Tehran are unbridgeable and that the chances of a near‑term military escalation are high. Some regional officials said Tehran was dangerously miscalculating by holding out for concessions, with US President Donald Trump boxed in by his own military buildup — unable to scale it back without losing face if there is no firm commitment from Iran to abandon its nuclear weapons ambitions.

“Both sides are sticking to their guns,” said Alan Eyre, a former US diplomat and Iran specialist, adding that nothing meaningful can emerge “unless the US and Iran walk back from their red lines — which I don’t think they will.  “What Trump can’t do is assemble all this military, and then come back with a ‘so‑so’ deal and pull out the military. I think he thinks he’ll lose face,” he said. “If he attacks, it’s going to get ugly quickly.” Two rounds of Iran-US talks have stalled on core issues, from uranium enrichment to missiles and sanctions relief. (Read More)

US moves dozens of F-35, F-15 fighter jets to Jordanian airbase - report

The United States military has moved dozens of fighter jets to a Jordanian air force base, according to satellite imagery and flight tracking data analysed by the New York Times on Friday. More than 60 jets were pictured parked on the Muwaffaq Salti base in central Jordan, which is three times more than the usual number of US attack aircraft present on the base, according to the Times.

According to the Times report, at least 68 cargo planes have additionally landed on the base since Sunday, and several US drones and helicopters were seen in the area. Soldiers were spotted installing new air defenses, systems that the Times theorized would be used to protect the base from potential Iranian strikes.

A live map of US Central Command (CENTCOM) movements, created by Tel Aviv University-affiliated think tank the Institute for National Security Studies, showed that as of Saturday afternoon, 30 F-35 fighter jets and 36 F-15 fighter jets were present at the Muwaffaq Salti base.
Jordanian officials, speaking to the Times on the condition of anonymity, stated that the deployment of US aircraft and equipment is a part of a larger defense agreement with the US.

The officials additionally shared that they hoped negotiations between the US and Iran would lead to a deal and prevent war in the region, as tensions between the two nations intensify. According to an additional Times report on Friday, US troops across the Middle East have been shuffled aroundas the possibility of US strikes on the Iranian regime looms. (Read More)

Board of Peace convenes as Hamas violates ceasefire

“This is not what disarming looks like,” an IDF spokesman says after a string of violations by the Islamist group.

As U.S. President Donald Trump’s international Board of Peace gathered in Washington on Thursday to chart a post-war future for the Gaza Strip, on the ground, Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad continued to systematically violate the truce, and Israeli forces engaged in a relentless effort to dismantle entrenched terror infrastructure and counter blatant ceasefire violations.

On Thursday, the Israel Defense Forces announced that several weeks previously, the Northern Gaza Brigade dismantled a kilometer-long underground route that included several terrorist hideouts in Beit Hanoun. The tunnel contained explosives. Meanwhile, the IDF Southern Command, which is responsible for Gaza, said its units continue to operate along the Yellow Line, which separates the 53% of eastern Gaza under Israeli security control from the 47% of the Strip that remains under Hamas’s control, and where most of the Gazan civilians are located.

Meanwhile, U.S. Army Maj. Gen. Jasper Jeffers, the commander of the International Stabilization Force (ISF), said that five countries pledged troops to the future intended peacekeeping force—Indonesia (which has pledged 8,000 troops), Albania, Kazakhstan, Kosovo and Morocco, while Egypt would send a deputy ISF commander. The Washington Board of Peace Summit also discussed plans for the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza (the would-be technocratic future government), and other efforts. At least two dozen delegations attended the summit, including from observer states. (Read More)

UK Denies US Use of Bases for Iran Strikes as Trump Targets Chagos Deal

The UK has reportedly withheld permission for the US to use RAF Fairford and Diego Garcia for potential strikes on Iran, citing international law. In retaliation, President Trump has withdrawn support for the UK’s Chagos Islands sovereignty deal, calling it a "big mistake." The United Kingdom has not granted approval for the United States to utilize British military bases for potential strikes against Iran, escalating tensions between the allies over President Donald Trump's demands amid ongoing nuclear negotiations with Tehran.

According to a report in The Times today, the UK is withholding permission for bases such as RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire, home to US heavy bombers and the joint US-UK facility at Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean, citing compliance with international law that could hold supporters accountable for wrongful acts. This decision has prompted Trump to withdraw US support for the UK's deal to transfer sovereignty of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, a move he criticized as "giving away" a strategic asset. 

In a statement on Truth Social on February 18, 2026, Trump warned: “Should Iran decide not to make a Deal, it may be necessary for the United States to use Diego Garcia, and the Airfield located in Fairford, in order to eradicate a potential attack by a highly unstable and dangerous Regime, An attack that would potentially be made on the United Kingdom, as well as other friendly Countries.” (Read More)

IDF strikes Hamas command center in Lebanon; 3 reported dead

The IDF said it struck a Hamas command center in Lebanon used to plan attacks on Israel; Lebanese reports said three people were killed and 12 wounded in Ain al-Hilweh near Sidon, where two missiles hit a building that once housed Palestinian security forces. The IDF said it struck Friday a compound used by Hamas operatives in the area of the Palestinian refugee camp of Ain al-Hilweh near Sidon in southern Lebanon. According to the military, the site had recently been used to prepare attacks against Israeli forces operating in Lebanon and to conduct training aimed at advancing various terror plots against the IDF and the State of Israel. 

Lebanese reports said three people were killed and 12 wounded in the strike. "The infrastructure that was struck was embedded in the heart of a civilian population, cynically exploiting village residents to advance the organization’s terror objectives and using them as human shields,” the IDF said. “The activity of the operatives at the compound constituted a violation of the understandings between Israel and Lebanon and posed a threat to the State of Israel 

Lebanon’s National News Agency reported that two missiles hit a building that had previously been used by the Joint Palestinian Security Forces operating in refugee camps in Lebanon and had “recently been rented by a certain party to serve as a kitchen for distributing food portions.” (Ed note: Ain al-Hilweh is less than 2 miles from the city of Sidon.) (Read More)

How the UN funding crisis will worsen in 2026

In late January, United Nations (UN) Secretary-General António Guterres sent a dramatic letter to UN Member States warning about the “imminent financial collapse” of the United Nations Organization. The letter followed earlier warnings that the UN Secretariat might have to reduce expenditure from the regular budget by 15 percent in 2026. This would mean reducing the workforce by about 2,600 staff.

The situation for many of the UN funds and programmes that rely on voluntary contributions to provide live-saving assistance in conflict regions is even more dire. Funding cuts, non-payment and late payment are just some of the key budgetary challenges facing the UN. By 8 February, the due date for membership contributions to the regular UN budget, only 55 countries had paid. The ongoing funding crisis affecting the Secretariat and the UN agencies – and the millions of people who depend on their support – has reignited the debate on alternative funding instruments.

The crisis of assessed contributions

The UN requires all Member States to contribute to its regular budget. According to the UN Charter, “the expenses of the Organization shall be borne by the Members as apportioned by the General Assembly”. The latest scale for the assessed contributions was established by UN General Assembly Resolution (79/249) on Christmas Day 2024. The key principle for the assessed contributions is that expenses for the UN’s budget should be shared broadly according to capacity to pay. An estimate of each country’s Gross National Income (GNI) is the main indicator to measure that capacity. While this sounds like a fair and easy formula, it also means that the lion’s share of contributions to the UN is collected from only two countries. The world’s two largest economies – the USA and China –contribute 22 percent and 20 percent, respectively.

Non-payment is not an unknown quantity for the UN system. And there is very little that the UN can actually do to sanction defaulters (a key sanction would be to suspend a Member State’s voting rights at the UN General Assembly). In order to map compliance – and name and shame the Member States that don’t comply – the UN is publishing the “Honour Roll” as a regularly updated database. The mapping indicates that, in 2025, only 151 of the 193 Member States paid their regular budget assessments in full, meaning that 42 did not pay up.

While most of these non-payers were small countries, the US default in particular left a big hole in the UN’s purse. The US is responsible for about 95 percent of unpaid contributions owed to the UN. (Ed note: President Trump has indeed halted or delayed funding to the UN. For many years the US tax payer dollar has gone to specific agencies and progams that we do not agree with. Have you ever heard the saying, "Get the US out of the UN, and get the UN out of the US. But wait a minute, what did Michael Corleone say, "Keep your friends close, but keep your enemies closer." That about says it all.) (Read More)

NUCLEAR SHOWDOWN IN IRAN

Missiles cloud Mideast skies over the Persian Gulf. Iran shuts down the Strait of Hormuz. Arab oil is choked off to world markets. Hezbollah and Hamas launch scores of missiles into Israel.  Global economies begin to collapse. Radioactivity permeates the skies over Bushehr’s nuclear reactor. 

About 2600 years ago the Hebrew prophets Jeremiah and Ezekiel issued parallel end times prophecies concerning modern-day Iran. Today the rogue country is becoming a nuclear nation and aggressively advancing its hegemony throughout the greater Middle East. Nuclear Showdown in Iran, The Ancient Prophecy of Elam is a non-fiction thriller taking the reader on a journey of discovery through the eyes of the prophets and the minds of today’s key national players.Can anything good come from the evil that is about to befall us? The ancient prophecy of Elam will reveal what God has ordained, what the prophets saw and what you need to know and do now. (CLICK HERE)

Iran's death penalty crackdown on protesters targets minors, Amnesty International warns

Amnesty International has claimed that minors are among 30 people at risk of execution amid expedited trials connected to Iranian protests that took place in January 2026, according to a report published on Friday. The Amnesty report reveals that among the 30 individuals arrested, eight have been sentenced to death, including one 18-year-old and a 19-year-old. In a statement addressing the pending executions, Amnesty said, “The Iranian authorities must immediately halt all plans to execute eight individuals sentenced to death after being convicted of committing offences during the January 2026 nationwide protests.”

These 30-some individuals, including two 17-year-olds, are currently undergoing or awaiting trial proceedings and are at risk of receiving the death penalty as their trials proceed, according to Amnesty. Their charges include a variety of offenses against the regime, such as arson and connections to the death of a security officer. These proceedings are reportedly tainted by numerous significant violations of the right to a fair trial. Such violations include allegations of confessions obtained through torture, denial of access to legal representation during the investigation phase, and refusal to recognize independent legal counsel appointed by the families of the accused for the trial.

According to Amnesty, some individuals sustained severe beatings while being pressured to confess to the charges against them. One individual was reportedly forced to confess after interrogators placed a gun in his mouth. Amnesty also stated it believes that the actual number of individuals at risk of receiving the death penalty in Iran is much higher than the figures officially reported by the Iranian government. Iranian officials have arrested thousands of protesters in connection with the uprising and have repeatedly threatened to impose ‘the maximum punishment’ (death penalty) without delay. (Read More)

Trump on Iran: They’d better negotiate a fair deal

US President Donald Trump on Friday said that Iran “better negotiate a fair deal", while slamming the regime’s leadership over their crackdown on anti-government protests last month. “You know, the people of Iran are a lot different than the leaders of Iran. And it's a very, very sad situation. 32,000 people were killed over a relatively short period of time," Trump said, marking the first time he has mentioned the death toll in the crackdown. “They were going to hang 800, two weeks ago, some by crane. They lift them up with a tall crane and they play them around the square."

“They were going to hang 837 people and I gave them the word: ‘If you hang one person, even one person, that you're going to be hit right then and there.’ I wasn't waiting two weeks and negotiating, and they gave up the hanging. They didn't hang 837. Supposedly they didn't hang anybody," he added. “I feel very badly for the people of Iran. They've lived in hell," continued Trump.

“I feel very badly for the people of Iran. They've lived in hell," continued Trump. Earlier on Friday, Trump appeared to confirm that he was considering a limited military strike on Iran to coax it into accepting a nuclear deal on his terms. Asked by reporters if he was mulling a limited strike, after The Wall Street Journal reported thison Thursday, Trump paused and smiled before responding, “I guess you can say I am considering it." At the same time, as reporters were ushered out of the room, Trump suggested that he was not going to publicly telegraph his plans regarding Iran. (Source)

GOD'S MIDDLE EAST PEACE PLAN

The plan inscribed below, which was presented by the prophet Jeremiah approximately2600 years ago, was to be fully implemented when Israel became a nation on May 14, 1948. Failure to do so has caused over six decades of conflict in the Middle East!.   

“Thus says the LORD: “Against all My evil neighbors who touch the inheritance which I have caused My people Israel to inherit—behold, I will pluck them [the Arabs] out of their [the Jews] land [Israel] and pluck out the house of Judah from among them [the surrounding Arab nations]. Then it shall be, after I have plucked them out, that I will return and have compassion on them and bring them back, everyone to his heritage and everyone [Jew and Arab] to his [respective] land. And it shall be, if they [the resettled Arabs] will learn carefully the ways of My people, to swear by My name, ‘As the LORD lives,’ as they taught My people to swear by Baal, then they shall be established in the midst of My people. But if they do not obey, I will utterly pluck up and destroy that nation,” says the LORD.(Jeremiah 12:14-17, NKJV; emphasis added)    

This plan represents the compassionate peaceful political and spiritual solutions to the regional problems of the return of the Jew into the Holy Land. Jeremiah suggests that his God would cause the corridors to open for the Arabs to leave the land destined to become the Jewish state and return to the lands of their ancestry. In addition, He would resettle the Jews out of the surrounding Arab nations, and bring them back into their homeland Israel. As each ethnic group migrated, they would vacate homes and jobs enabling economic opportunities for the returning peoples and in some cases, already existing communities to inhabit. These Jeremiah passages represent the ancient blueprints, divinely designed to insure the successful return of the Jewish people back to the land of their heritage.    

This plan was put into sovereign place after World War I when the Arab countries gained their statehoods. Jeremiah 12:15 says, “I will return and have compassion on them and bring them back, everyone to his heritage and everyone[Jew and Arab] to his [respective] land.” How’s that for a land for peace solution? The remapping of the atlases after World War I makes the political land for peace deals of our time pale in comparison.   

The Middle East conflict that confounds the politicians today has not caught God off guard. The biblical peace plan took into consideration that there would be “evil neighbors”homesteading the holy land. He foreknew they would need be relocated to make way for the return of the Jewish people. Provisions were included in Jeremiah’s prophecy for their future as well. They would be “plucked out” and resettled in their former homelands. A fertile future awaited them, if they entreated their affections to Jehovah, Jeremiah’s God.   

In an apparent fulfillment of the Jeremiah 12:14-17 prophecy, millions of Arabs have been “plucked out” from the territory formerly recognized as Palestine. For almost seventy years, these uprooted Arabs have been unable to relocate into an alternative homeland. These Arabs from Palestine have been reduced to a refugee status because their Arab relatives have mostly shut their national doors on them. These Palestinian Refugees are in the Gaza, West Bank, and in several of the neighboring Arab nations. These refugees serve as a buffer between Israel and the surrounding Arab states.   

These Arab nations have cleverly managed to shift the burden of responsibility for the relocation of these refugees into the lap of the International community, the same community that legislated the re-establishment of the nation Israel as the Jewish State, implemented in 1948. UNRWA the (United Nations Relief and Works Agency), was established May 1, 1950, to find a solution to this refugee problem.   (Ed note: This article was written June 5, 2016 and is still very timely today. A must read.)  (Read More)

The Largest Armada Since Iraq: Trump’s 40,000 Troops Surround the Iranian Coast

The United States has amassed its largest military force since the 2003 invasion of Iraq, positioning a massive fleet and stealth air wing to conduct a multi-week campaign against Iran.

President Trump’s military buildup in the Middle East has now officially surpassed any deployment seen in the last two decades, creating a force of such magnitude that analysts are calling it "The Trump Armada." With over 40,000 combat troops, two massive aircraft carrier strike groups, and a lethal array of stealth aircraft, the United States is now capable of sustaining a high-intensity aerial siege against the Iranian regime for weeks. This unprecedented concentration of firepower is designed to provide the President with total operational flexibility, allowing the US to strike deep into Iranian territory without relying on the permission or bases of neighboring countries that might be hesitant to join the war.

The centerpieces of this naval force are the USS Abraham Lincoln and the USS Gerald R. Ford, the latter being the largest and most powerful warship ever built. These "mobile airbases" carry thousands of personnel and dozens of advanced fighter jets, including the F-18 and F-35. Supporting these giants are 13 destroyers and cruisers equipped with Aegis radar systems and hundreds of Tomahawk cruise missiles, capable of hitting targets 2,000 kilometers away with surgical precision. These ships are strategically distributed, with units in the Red Sea to protect Israel from Houthi attacks, others in the Mediterranean to intercept Iranian missiles, and a heavy presence in the Persian Gulf ready to launch offensive strikes.

Perhaps the most terrifying element of the sea-based force is the reported presence of a nuclear-powered cruise missile submarine. This "secret warehouse" of firepower can carry more than 200 Tomahawk missiles, allowing it to decimate Iranian command centers before the regime even realizes an attack has begun. Complementing the naval fleet are three High-Speed Combat Ships (LCS) in the Arabian Sea, specifically designed for fast-paced littoral combat near the Iranian coastline to counter the Revolutionary Guard's fast-attack boats. (Ed note: This article is full of great information, but the thing that stands out is the "40,000 Troops." The seagoing Marines involved in this buildup are Marine Expeditionary Units (MEUs) deployed with the Navy's amphibious ready groups and carrier strike groups. Marine Expeditionary Units (MEUs): These are rapid-response forces capable of amphibious assaults, special operations, and rapid deployment. MEUs are typically embarked on U.S. Navy amphibious assault ships. These men are well trained, can attack the caves located along Iran's seashore, or go inland to get the job done.) (Read More)

'Hundreds of strikes per day': Former CENTCOM deputy says US can wipe out Islamic Regime in hours

A possible first wave of an attack on Iran would focus on strategic missile sites and launchers, the most immediate threats to US forces and Israel, a former CENTCOM official told the Post.

The massive accumulation of US military assets in the Middle East is not merely a show of force but a signal that the United States has the capacity to dismantle the Iranian regime’s power structure in a matter of hours, according to Vice Admiral (Ret.) Bob Harward, former deputy commander of US Central Command (CENTCOM). “One thing he’s illustrated is that [President Donald] Trump does what he says,” Harward told The Jerusalem Post, citing the withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action and the US’s stance that it will not tolerate a nuclear-armed Iran. “Now he’s positioned the assets for a military action,” Harward said.

“If he cannot meet the objectives regarding the nuclear and ballistic missile program, he’s willing to go beyond mediation and act.” If the order to strike is given, Harward, who served as deputy commander of CENTCOM until 2013, detailed a hierarchy of targets designed to neuter Iran’s offensive capabilities while sparing the general population. The priority, according to the former commander, would be “bottom-up.” The first wave would target strategic missile locations and launchers – the direct threats to US forces and Israel. The second priority would be neutralizing the remnants of surrogates outside the country that pose a risk of retaliation against Israel. However, the most significant shift in strategy concerns the regime’s internal grip on power. Harward suggested that a campaign would target the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and the instruments used to oppress the Iranian people, rather than the national infrastructure.

“You’re not going to look at infrastructure,” Harward explained. “This is to provide the Iranian people a change in government, so I think those types of targets will not be hit. It will be focused only on the things that enable the regime and the IRGC to suppress the people.” Perhaps the most chilling warning for Tehran was Harward’s description of modern American warfare capabilities, which he noted are vastly superior to what was seen in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. “Because of what we’ve learned and what we’ve been able to develop technology-wise – be it command, control, and targeting – it allows your mass of strikes to be more effective,” Harward said. (Read More)

IDF chief says finger 'on the trigger' as Tehran threat looms over Middle East

Iran and Yemen’s Houthis will pay “an immediate and grave price” if they attack Israel in response to a potential US attack, IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Eyal Zamir and Defense Minister Israel Katz said Thursday. The IDF’s metaphorical finger was “on the trigger” if its enemies were to make any operational change, Zamir said. Katz cited Israel’s success at assassinating several senior Houthi officials as a down payment on what could be a much more severe response if the terrorist group were to attack Israel in response to an American attack against Iran.

The US would likely attack Iran eventually, but not necessarily in the coming days, despite the spike in global media “noise” surrounding the conflict, people familiar with the matter told The Jerusalem Post late Wednesday night. Israel’s impression is that US President Donald Trump hasnot yet decided on his final course of action, even if his disappointment in Iran’s negotiating positions this week made an eventual attack more likely, the sources indicated.

Many of the latest reports are viewed by some Israeli officials as global media noise that is based on the general impression from Trump administration officials coming out of this week’s negotiations as opposed to crossing the threshold. There has also been intense focus on whether Trump’s two-week deadline for Iran to return with a new offer can be compared to the two weeks last June. That turned out to be a fake and was cover for the US attack on the Fordow nuclear facility after only three days of the two-week deadline had passed. (Read More)

Iran tells UN: We will respond decisively to any US aggression

The Islamic Republic of Iran on Thursday submitted an urgent letter to the United Nations Security Council and the UN Secretary-General, condemning what it described as the "persistent threat of the use of force" by the United States. The letter, authored by Iran's Ambassador to the UN, Amir Saeid Iravani, specifically targets recent public statements made by President Donald Trump regarding potential military action against the regime's nuclear facilities.

In the correspondence, Iravani drew "urgent attention" to "the continued threats by officials of the United States to resort to the use of force, including the recent public statement by the President of the United States concerning the use of the Diego Garcia base in connection with a potential military attack against the Islamic Republic of Iran." The Ambassador claimed these threats "constitute a flagrant violation of the Charter of the United Nations and international law and risk plunging the region into a new cycle of crisis and instability."

The Iranian complaint centered on a social media post dated February 18, 2026, in which President Trump allegedly issued an "explicit public threat." According to the letter, the President stated, "... Should Iran decide not to make a deal, it may be necessary for the United States to use Diego Garcia, and the Airfield located in Fairford, in order to eradicate a potential attack ...." Iravani warned that such statements, combined with the "persistent movement and build-up of military equipment and assets by the United States," signal a "real risk of military aggression." He asserted that the consequences of such action "would be catastrophic for the region and would constitute a grave threat to international peace and security." (Source)

Judea and Samaria facing crisis as Oct. 7 shattered status quo, conference panel says

Most participants on a panel at this week’s Conference of Presidents meeting said Judea and Samaria is heading toward a collision.

Among the topics covered at the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations’ 51st Annual Leadership Mission, taking place in Jerusalem this week, were the future of Judea and Samaria and the impact the Oct. 7, 2023, massacre will have on Arab-Israel relations. According to Noa Shusterman, a researcher and the coordinator of the INSS Israel-Palestinian Research Program, who took part in a panel of observers on Tuesday, parties have begun campaigning for the upcoming Israeli elections slated for this October, but there has been no discussion about the Palestinian issue.

Even though an international coalition is being put together to govern the Gaza Strip under Trump’s 20-point plan, that includes talk of a Palestinian state, that this was not spoken about in Israeli discourse means “we’re heading toward a clash,” she said. Mohammad Darawshe, director of Strategy at the Center for Shared Society at Givat Haviva (the national education center of the Kibbutz Federation) and an Arab Israeli, said he doesn’t see willingness on either the Israeli or Palestinian Arab side to move the ball forward. He laid the blame on Oct. 7, which has led to mistrust, fear and a loss of hope. He warned that if the frustration felt on the Arab side is allowed to continue “the next Oct. 7 is around the corner.”

Another panel participant, IDF Lt. Col. (res.) Avi Shalev, who formerly served as head of the Palestinian affairs branch and adviser to the Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT) Defense Ministry unit, said Oct. 7 was an “earthquake” that changed everything and will lead to a crisis in Judea and Samaria, pointing to elements that have started to take the law into their own hands. Israel Ganz, head of the Binyamin Regional Council and the chairman of the Yesha Council, said that more than 70% of Israelis don’t want a Palestinian state because it means another terror-run region, such as in Gaza. Israel vacated Gaza in 2005 and received a massacre in return, he said. (Ed note: Now we have come to the heart of a problem that President Trump doesn't understand, the land belongs to the Jew, not the so called "Palestinian.") (Read More)