A return to the Iran nuclear deal would only keep Iran “several months” away from breakout time, US Special Envoy Rob Malley said in an interview on Friday, as opposed to the original 2015 agreement that was meant to ensure it was a year away.
“The main... constraint that puts Iran several months away from having enough fissile material for one bomb... would last until 2031,” Malley said, responding to a question on PBS NewsHour as to whether the deal is worth returning to if restrictions on the manufacture of advanced centrifuges expires next year.
“The situation we’re in today, as a result of the decision [by the Trump administration] to withdraw from the deal, is Iran is only a handful of weeks away from having enough fissile material for a bomb. So again, we have to compare this to the reality we’re living today, if we could get a deal that would put Iran back several months away from being able to have enough fissile material for a bomb,” Malley emphasized.
This is not the first time the US and other parties to the negotiations with Iran have said that a return to the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action could not keep the Islamic Republic a year away from breakout, though previous estimations had put it at half a year. Several months is likely fewer than six.
Iran built and installed hundreds of centrifuges this year that are so advanced they cannot be dismantled and sent to another country if a deal is reached, which reduces the time it would take to enrich enough fissile material for a bomb. That point, known as breakout time, does not include the additional time it takes to assemble a bomb, which is generally presumed to be short. READ MORE